Skip to content

For architecture & AEC

Catch it before the set goes out

The mistakes that cost the most are the mechanical ones: a door tag with no schedule row, a rating that contradicts the compartment line, a dimension that stopped agreeing three revisions ago.
Send us a sheetTalk it through
  • Plan-to-schedule reconciliation
  • Element-level revision diffs
  • Findings cite the sheet
Workflow diagram showing a drawing set indexed, callouts and notes extracted, and findings assembled for engineer review
Sheets indexed, read, and reconciled across the set.

The situation

Coordination errors are found by reading, and reading does not scale

A hundred-sheet set has a finite number of internal contradictions, and finding them means holding two sheets in your head at once. It is exhausting, it is done under deadline, and it is exactly the kind of work that a machine can do exhaustively where a person cannot.

  • Schedules reconciled

    Tags on plan views matched to schedule rows, with both kinds of mismatch listed.

  • Revisions compared

    What was added, removed and moved between two issues, element by element.

  • Openings audited

    Doors and windows checked for widths, ratings and the spaces they connect.

  • Code pre-checks

    Geometric code rules run early in design development, each citing its clause.

How it lands

Into the tools you already use

Findings come back as a reviewable list with locations and an annotated PDF for the coordination meeting. Nothing is resolved automatically: the system's job is to find candidates, and the architect's is to decide.
  • An annotated PDF per sheet
  • A discrepancy list with both sides shown
  • Change lists between issues
  • Runs on your infrastructure if drawings cannot leave it

Every engagement starts from models already trained on floor plans and tunes them on yours. What that involves.

Start here

Send one of your own sheets

What our models find on a drawing you recognise tells you more about feasibility than any number we could quote.

Send us one sheet

We run it through our floor plan models and send back the extracted data with an annotated overlay, so you can see what comes off your own drawings before anyone books a call.

  • Back in about 2 business days
  • PDF, DXF or a scan
  • NDA on request
This is our base model, before any tuning for you. On a paid project we train it further on your own drawings, which is where the rest of the accuracy comes from. So this shows you the starting point, not the best we can do.

By submitting, you agree to our Privacy Policy. We never share your details.

FAQ

Questions from teams like yours

  • No. It produces candidates for a person to review. Professional responsibility for a drawing set stays exactly where it is, and any tool claiming otherwise is selling you a liability.

Get in touch

Tell us what is on your drawings

Describe the sheets you get and what you need off them. We will tell you what our models already handle, what needs fine-tuning on your drawings, and what is not worth automating at all.

Reply time
Within 1 business day

Would rather show than tell? Send one sheet for a free analysis

We reply within 1 business day.

By submitting, you agree to our Privacy Policy. We never share your details.